100-
137
537
interfering in a
nirationl villages,
distute between twos
else
likely from the unvicty of
as appears
Sutto
the
cxpetition-
Art At
accompany somewhat notorious character
was
ausions to follow in the footsteps Af his de contererate Mashooting
and to extend his on inthience by
1
inois it supporch that he could in like marmer command the services of British men of war. At all events this appear to me to have hen
in which we ought covenly not to have interfered. The min
care
were not accused wen
of Stutuung A having committed
any
act if
Piracy on the high seas - neither
British no
Colonial interests were
in any way concerned in the
dispute - and Sects should have been told to seek rediss
from
his
был
bovernment, as considering the state
ns
of things
regards pirncy prevailing alow the whole count of
china, and
ever arriving
the impossibility of our wer at the real merits of disagreements between the inhabitants
F
neighbouring villages,_ both sides being
―
often equally in the wrong nothing but mischief and injustice, to say nothing of
the illegality proceeding,
Can
follow
of
our
the
interference in cases in which the trade of
this Colony is not interferes
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.